Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is 1,5 between lines; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

1 – Articles, interviews, essays or reviews – unpublished – written in Portuguese, English, Spanish, French, Italian, German or in one of the Amazonian indigenous languages ​​will be accepted.

2 – Proponents or authors must submit their proposals exclusively through the Electronic Journal Publishing System (SEER).

3 – In the case of co-authored texts, up to two co-authors will be accepted for each proposal presented.

4 – Each proposal must be approved by at least two members of the Editorial Board or by ad hoc reviewers to be published. All evaluations are double-blind, so we strongly recommend not to enter your personal data in the submission file.

5 – Proposals accepted with restrictions will be returned to their authors for adjustments.

6 – Proposals submitted that do not comply with these guidelines will be rejected by the editors and will not be forwarded for review by the reviewers. There will not be more than one publication by the same author in the same year

7 – Articles must have 15 (fifteen) to 30 (thirty) pages; interviews, a maximum of 15 (fifteen) pages; essays between 10 and 20 pages; and reviews, at most, 10 (ten) pages.

8 – Articles must have the following structure:

8.1 - Pre-textual elements:

a) Title and subtitle: in the first line, centered, bold, capital letters, Times New Roman font, size 12.

b) Abstract: two lines below the title. Insert the word abstract in capital letters, body 10, followed by a colon and the text. Write the text in a single paragraph, single spaced, justified, with at least 100 (one hundred) and at most 150 (one hundred and fifty) words, giving preference to the use of third person singular and active voice. Font: Times New Roman, size 10, for the entire abstract.

c) Keywords: in number from 3 (three) to 5 (five), separated from the abstract by double spacing. Put the term Keywords in capital letters. Font: Times New Roman, size 10. Each keyword has the first letter capitalized and the rest in lowercase, separated by a period.

d) Title in English: it is recommended, for this item and the two following ones, to seek a review by an English language specialist.

e) Abstract: put the word ABSTRACT in capital letters, body 10, followed by a colon. Write the text in English, in a single paragraph, single spaced, justified, with a minimum of 150 (one hundred and fifty) and a maximum of 250 (two hundred and fifty) words. Font: Times New Roman, size 10, for the entire abstract.

f) Keywords: insert below the ABSTRACT, with double spacing, the word KEYWORD without capital letters, body 10, followed by a colon. Insert from 3 (three) to 5 (five) words, in Times New Roman font, size 10. Each word with the first letter capitalized and the rest in lowercase, separated by a period

WARNING: the identification of the author(s) must not be inserted in the body of the submitted proposal, but must be sent in the author's register. The journal's system requests the ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) as the authorship identifier.

8.2 - Textual elements:

a) Font: Times New Roman, size 12 and justified alignment throughout the text, separated from the keywords by double spacing.

b) Page configuration: left and top margins of 3.0 cm and right and bottom of 2.0 cm, without page numbering.

c) Spacing: 1.5 between lines and double (12pt) between paragraphs and parts of the text (titles, abstract, keywords, section titles, tables, illustrations, highlighted quotes, etc.).

d) Quotations: in the body of the text, up to 3 (three) lines, enclosed in double quotes. Above 3 (three) lines must be highlighted outside the body of the text, in Times New Roman font, size 10, single spaced, with a 4cm indent to the left.

e) All references to citations or mentions to other texts (both those included in the body of the text and those that should be highlighted) must be indicated after the citation with the following information, in parentheses: author's last name, in small letters (ABNT 10520), comma, year of publication, page abbreviation and page number. E.x.: (Sarlo, 2007, p.71). The use of idem or ibidem and Cf should be avoided. When using the apud, put the same information previously requested for the author of the text from which the citation was taken.

f) Explanatory notes: if necessary, they must be included in the footnotes. Font: Times New Roman, body 10. Alignment justified, keeping simple space inside the note and between the notes.

g) Section titles and subtitles: only with the first letter capitalized, without indentation, in bold, italics, without numbering and in Times New Roman 12 font, separated by double spacing (12pt).

h) Tables, figures, photographs, among others, must be inserted in the text, immediately after being cited, with the proper explanation at the bottom of the tables, numbered sequentially.

8.3 - Post-textual elements:

Placed right after the end of the article.

a) References: put the word REFERENCES, in capital letters, bold, aligned to the left, always at the end of the article. References list must also be aligned to the left.

9 - Reviews must contain a minimum of 8 (eight) and a maximum of 10 (ten) pages. The work reviewed must have been published within the last 5 years at most. Abstracts are dispensed.  Reviews must also:
  1. Have a pertinent title, not limited to reproducing the title of the work reviewed.
  2. Present relevance and thematic suitability regarding the scope of the magazine.
  3. To clearly present the objective of the work.
  4. To present critical reading, not limiting yourself to summarizing the main points.
  5. The bibliographic references must comply with the journal's guidelines.
  6. To present concise language, without redundancies and spelling problems

Examples for references.

For books:

PACHECO, A. S. À margem dos “Marajós”: cotidiano, memórias e imagens da “cidade-floresta” – Melgaço. Belém (PA): Paka Tatu, 2006.

BAKHTIN, M. Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem: problemas fundamentais do método sociológico na ciência da linguagem. Tradução de Michel Lahud e Iara Frateschi Vieira. 12ª edição, São Paulo: Hucitec, 2006.

For chapters of books:

VILELA, E. Corpos inabitáveis. Errância, filosofia e memória. In: LARROSA, J. e SKLIAR, C. Habitantes de Babel: políticas e poéticas da diferença. Trad. Semíramis Gorini da Veiga. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2001, p. 233-253.

Para artigos de revistas:

PORTELLI, A. A filosofia e os fatos. Tempo, Revista Digital de História do Departamento e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 1, n. 2, p. 59-72, 1996.

CANDAU, V. M. F. Educacion Intercultural en America Latina: distintas concepciones y tensiones actuales. Estudos Pedagógicos, Valdivia/Región de los Ríos, Chile, vol. 36, n. 2, 2010.

TIRADO, P. O. Tres notas sobre conflictos e interculturalidad en el centro sur de la Amazonia. Universitas: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, n. 4, p. 129-146, 2006. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3dIaTkS Acesso em: 14 ago. 2019

For articles published in newspaper:

SILVA, F. B. O processo eleitoral de 1982 no Acre: antecedentes e condicionantes eleitorais. Jornal Página 20, Rio Branco, 11 maio 2013. Coluna Aconteceu, p. 12

Para teses de doutorado e dissertações de mestrado:

ROCHA, A. C. A reinvenção e representação do seringueiro na cidade de Rio Branco, Acre (1971-1996). Tese de Doutorado, Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduação em História da PUC-SP, São Paulo, 2006.

ALVES, A. S. Africanismos em atlas linguísticos regionais brasileiros e sua dicionarização. Dissertação de Mestrado. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras: Linguagem e Identidade da Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, Acre, 2013.

ARTIGOS

Política padrão de seção

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.