A potential zoonotic and ecological threat: Is the reintroduction of primate pets a secure measure?

Autores

  • Luciana dos Santos Medeiros Universidade Federal do Acre
  • Yuri Karaccas de Carvalho Universidade Federal do Acre
  • Giovana Barbosa Morais Universidade Federal do Acre
  • Vânia Maria França Ribeiro Universidade Federal do Acre
  • David A. Ashford Kansas States University College of Veterinary Medicine
  • Soraia Figueiredo de Souza

Palavras-chave:

endoparasites, ectoparasites, epidemiology, captive primates, Amazon

Resumo

Primates may be infected by pathogens of human origin, and this may be a concern for releasing such pets back into the wild where they will join troops of wild primates. To determine this risk and the range and burden of endo and ectoparasitic infections among primate pets in Acre, Brazil, we collected appropriate biological samples from all primates conducted to the Screening Center of Wild Animals (CETAS) in the state of Acre, Brazil, during 2011 and 2012.  Among all 14 animals which were confiscated for release into the wild, we found 2 (14.3%) to be infected with Strongyloides sp. and fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) in two (other) of the primates evaluated. Strongyloides sp. are zoonotic parasites. We suggest that the finding of these zoonotic endoparasites indicates a need for routine fecal examination and; or worming of pet primates for the safety for animal handlers and people involved in the reintroduction of primates.

Referências

Pereira WLA, Galo KR, Silva KSM, Soares MCP, Alves MM. Ocorrência de hepatites virais, helmintíases e protozooses em primatas neotropicais precedentes de criação domiciliar: afecções de transmissão fecal-oral com potencial zoonótico. Rev Pan-Amaz Saúde 2010; 1(3): 57-60.

World Organization For Animal Health (OIE). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Paris: OIE; 2013 [accessed 2017 May 20]. Available at: https://www.oie.int/doc/ged/D12825.PDF.

Thoen OC, Lobue PA, Enarson DA, Kaneene JB, Kantor IN. Tuberculosis: a re-emerging disease in animals and humans. Vet Ital 2009; 45(1): 135-181.

Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA). Biodiversidade: fauna silvestre. Brasília: IBAMA; 2016 [accessed 2017 May 20]. 23ed. [306 p.]. Available at: http://www.ibama.gov.br/fauna-silvestre?view=default.

SILVA AS, Coradini GP, Gressler LT, Soares JF, Lara VM, Carregaro AB, Monteiro SG. Ocorrência de protozoários gastrintestinais em primatas mantidos em cativeiro na região sul do Brasil. Cienc. Rural 2008; 38(9): 2658-2661.

Labruna MB, Paula CD, Lima TF, Sana DA. 2002. Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on Wild Animals from the Porto-Primavera Hydroelectric Power Station Area, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 97(8): 1133-1136.

Foreyt WJ. Parasitologia Veterinária: Manual de Referência. São Paulo: Roca, 2005.

Figueiredo MA, Santos, ACG, Guerra RMSNC. Ectoparasitos de animais silvestres no Maranhão. Pesq Vet Bras 2010; 30(11): 988-990.

Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. Parasitologia Veterinária. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2010.

Barberi, LO; Grasselli, R; Ananias, M. Pinto, TS; Bozza, FA; Soares, M; Salluh, JIF. Estrongiloidíase disseminada: diagnóstico e tratamento. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 2007, 19(4): 463-468.

Departamento de DST, AIDS e hepatites virais. AIDS no Brasil. Brasília: Departamento de DST, AIDS e hepatites virais; Brasília: 2012 [accessed 2017 May 20]. Available at: http://www.aids.gov.br/pagina/aids-no-brasil.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-11-16

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original